syft/internal/packagemetadata
Alex Goodman 1827ce2f4f
feat: catalog CPAN distributions installed by perl clients
Adds `perl` as a language and `cpan` as a package type, with two catalogers behind them.

- `perl-cpan-installed-cataloger` reads `.meta/*/install.json` (cpanm, cpm, carton) and `auto/**/.packlist` (anything installed through `ExtUtils::MakeMaker` or `Module::Build`, including CPAN.pm). Both globs are unanchored, so a local-lib or carton application tree is found the same as a system install.
- `perl-cpan-meta-cataloger` reads an unpacked release's own `META.json` or `META.yml`, gated on a sibling `MANIFEST` so source checkouts are ignored.

Packages are keyed on the **distribution**, not the module, because that is what CPAN, MetaCPAN and the advisory data all use. `LWP.pm` belongs to `libwww-perl` and reporting it as `LWP` would make every advisory for it unreachable. The distribution name comes from `install.json`'s `dist` field, and from the `auto/` path for packlists.

purls are `pkg:cpan/<distribution>@<version>`, with the PAUSE author added as an `author` qualifier when the evidence carries it. Metadata comes in two types: `cpan-distribution` for installed evidence and `cpan-unpacked-release` for a release sitting on disk. The tiers differ in more than a name, so a consumer should not have to string-match a cataloger name to tell them apart: an unpacked release has no PAUSE path and therefore no author and no file list, and "installed and loadable by the interpreter" is a materially stronger claim than "a source tree exists here".

A packlist's version comes from `perllocal.pod`. EUMM writes it and the packlist from the same variables in the same install target, so the `auto/` path segments and the perllocal `Module` name are the same key, and the recorded `VERSION` is what was evaluated at build time rather than what can be read back statically. Scraping `$VERSION` out of the main `.pm` is the fallback, since `NO_PERLLOCAL` suppresses the file and Module::Build never writes one. Three rules pick the stanza: dashed module name, longest `installed into` libdir that prefixes the packlist path, and last match wins because the file is append-only. Without the libdir rule a second perl on the image silently supplies the version.

Where scraping is the fallback, it reads more than a plain `our $VERSION = '...'`. A version declared in the package statement (`package Foo::Bar v1.0.0;`) counts, which matters because a distribution can declare it that way and carry no `$VERSION` at all: `CPAN::02Packages::Search` is one, and without this it reports no version and matches nothing. Fully qualified `$Foo::Bar::VERSION` counts too, which is what older Dist::Zilla emitted and what real `JSON::PP` 2.27300 still carries. `qv('1.2.3')` is handled. A version computed at runtime is not, and those are reported without one rather than guessed at.

Packlist entries are parsed the way `ExtUtils::Packlist` writes them: a line can carry space-separated metadata after the path (`/path/to/File.pm type=file`), which is what `installperl` produces, so the suffix is stripped rather than the line being cut at its first space.

`META.yml` is read alongside `META.json`, because about 43% of current CPAN releases ship no `META.json` and they skew old, which is where the advisories are. Where both sit in one directory the `META.json` wins. A `META.yml` a strict parser rejects skips that directory rather than failing the scan, which is routine rather than defensive for pre-spec releases.

A packlist is literally a file list, so its paths are surfaced through `pkg.FileOwner`. They are reported as recorded, unfiltered: a path the packlist claims and the filesystem lacks means the file was removed or overwritten out from under the installer, which is worth seeing rather than hiding.

Build leftovers under `~/.cpanm/work` and `~/.cpan/build` are skipped. They genuinely are unpacked release tarballs, `MANIFEST` included, so the `MANIFEST` gate admits them and a path exclusion is the only signal available. Without it every distribution on an image that did not clean up is reported twice. The cost is that a tarball deliberately kept under `~/.cpan/build` stops being reported.

Two behaviors that look wrong but are not:

- a distribution can be reported twice at different versions. `libwww-perl` 5.836 bundles `HTTP-Date`, `HTTP-Message` and `LWP-MediaTypes`, and installing it over the modern standalone releases overwrites their `.pm` files. Both versions are genuinely present, so the merge refuses to pair disagreeing versions rather than hiding one.
- a distribution with no readable version is reported without one rather than dropped, so it stays visible.

The coverage boundary is stated in full in the `package perl` doc comment. In short: modules installed from distro packages are out of scope, since packagers strip CPAN metadata with `NO_PACKLIST` and deb, rpm and apk already report them. Core and dual-life distributions bundled with the interpreter have no coverage, because nothing on disk carries their versions; the interpreter itself is reported separately. Vendored trees, `App::FatPacker` output and PAR archives are invisible, because what they carry is module identity with no offline map to a distribution. A packlist-derived name is the installer's `NAME` and may not be the distribution name, which is left to the vulnerability data to resolve.

One correction worth calling out, since it is easy to arrive at twice: a sibling `MANIFEST` is the only thing separating an unpacked release from a source checkout. An earlier version of the guard also rejected any tree containing a `dist.ini`, on the theory that it marked a Dist::Zilla source tree. dzil ships `dist.ini` *inside* the tarballs it builds and lists it in the generated `MANIFEST`, so that exclusion was silently skipping real releases, `URI` among them.

Signed-off-by: Alex Goodman <wagoodman@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-08-04 11:30:30 -04:00
..
2025-10-14 13:58:31 -04:00